Safety

AI, Digital Tools Can Operationalize Readiness for Crisis and Emergency Management

This paper explores how artificial intelligence (AI), cognitive models, and integrated digital tools can transform readiness from periodic drills into a continuous, measurable capability.

CEM failures in incidents
CEM failures in incidents.
Source: SPE 229328.

Crisis and emergency management (CEM) in high-risk sectors such as oil and gas, petrochemicals, and transportation faces growing challenges from operational complexity, interagency coordination gaps, and evolving hazards. While compliance frameworks set essential standards, many organizations still struggle to maintain continuous operational readiness. This paper explores how artificial intelligence (AI), cognitive models, and integrated digital tools can operationalize readiness.

Industry Incident Landscape

The authors cite a report of the Institution of Chemical Engineers’ Safety and Loss Prevention Special Interest Group, “Learning Lessons From Major Incidents.” In the report, root causes of 25 various incidents since Piper Alpha in 1988 were analyzed to identify underlying lessons. The lessons learnt for crisis and emergency management are provided in Table 1 of the complete paper. The table indicates that gaps in crisis and emergency management often lie in lack of compliance, inadequate planning, training and competency issues, and response.

×
SPE_logo_CMYK_trans_sm.png
Continue Reading with SPE Membership
SPE Members: Please sign in at the top of the page for access to this member-exclusive content. If you are not a member and you find JPT content valuable, we encourage you to become a part of the SPE member community to gain full access.