Formation damage

CO2 Injection Model Accounts for Joule-Thomson Cooling, Heat Exchange

This work introduces an analytical model for nonisothermal CO2 injection that accounts for both Joule-Thomson cooling and interformation heat exchange.

Fig. 1—Phase diagram for a NSS temperature front model with trajectories for tD = 0.01, 0.1, 1 for the CO2-storage projects Gorgon (blue) and Sleipner (green).
Fig. 1—Phase diagram for a NSS temperature front model with trajectories for tD = 0.01, 0.1, 1 for the CO2-storage projects Gorgon (blue) and Sleipner (green).
Source: SPE 230576.

Heat exchange with surrounding formations and Joule-Thomson (JT) cooling during CO2 injection into deep saline aquifers and depleted hydrocarbon reservoirs can lead to substantial declines in well injectivity. This work introduces an analytical model for nonisothermal CO2 injection that accounts for both JT cooling and interformation heat exchange, assuming that heat transfer begins upon arrival of the temperature front rather than the gas/water front, as adopted in earlier models.

Introduction

Temperature and pressure profiles provide important information about reservoir behavior during CO2 injection. Analytical models can provide such information more quickly with less computational expense. Additionally, the analytical models yield significantly faster inverse solvers, where iterative procedures include forward runs; thus, the inverse solutions for interpretation of laboratory corefloods and improved reservoir characterization from field data are more effective under analytical modeling.

×
SPE_logo_CMYK_trans_sm.png
Continue Reading with SPE Membership
SPE Members: Please sign in at the top of the page for access to this member-exclusive content. If you are not a member and you find JPT content valuable, we encourage you to become a part of the SPE member community to gain full access.