Decommissioning

Alternative Method of Planning Decommissioning Reduces Costs

This paper reviews the existing planning process for decommissioning projects on the UK Continental Shelf and explores an alternative approach using the facility removal date instead of the cessation of production date.

Deepwater DP drilling platform with supply vessel
A new point of reference offers a clearer distinction that separates well plugging and abandonment activities and a facility’s removal operations in decommissioning projects.
landbysea/Getty Images

The complete paper reviews the existing planning process for decommissioning projects on the UK Continental Shelf (UKCS) and explores an alternative approach of planning with reference to facility removal date rather than to cessation of production date. This approach aims to enable a more-effective planning in a high-oil-price and limited supply-chain-capacity environment to achieve cost reduction.

Introduction

Largely because of the implementation of the Maximizing Economic Recovery (MER) strategy, one prime focus of planning for decommissioning involves moving the cessation of production date as far out as possible to comply with the strategy. What this also means is that cost has been placed as the first priority in decommissioning in the UKCS landscape

However, it must not be forgotten that any project delays or business interruption can also affect the overall cost of decommissioning. Project management can arguably be even more important than engineering innovations considering the complexity of the project.

×
SPE_logo_CMYK_trans_sm.png
Continue Reading with SPE Membership
SPE Members: Please sign in at the top of the page for access to this member-exclusive content. If you are not a member and you find JPT content valuable, we encourage you to become a part of the SPE member community to gain full access.