Digital oilfield

Intelligent Fields Technology-2017

The most-competitive emerging systems blend artificial intelligence to bring better efficiency to the human work that results in good business decisions. As a result, we waste less time and fewer resources finding and manipulating data and focus more on complex engineering judgment.

In the early days of intelligent fields, we tended to see the game as more data, more control, more models, and more integration. All these aspects, of course, are still key components to the system solutions that are now emerging. However, the most-competitive emerging systems blend artificial intelligence to bring better efficiency to the human work that results in good business decisions. As a result, we waste less time and fewer resources finding and manipulating data and focus more on complex engineering judgment and building richness into the bases of our decisions.

When Deep Blue beat Kasparov, it was a watershed event, but the timing of the event was the only surprise. That a computer could beat the best human chess player at some point was certain long before it happened.

As with most industries, the oil industry is ripe for automation of the type that is likely to trivialize much of what consumes our days as engineers today—which might seem threatening if you are a Kasparov. Unlike chess players, we have a much larger endgame, and our effective mastery of these technologies can help us sustain and deliver in an environment of intense competitive pressures. The body of knowledge and practice in this area is large and growing quickly, and some of the recommended articles in this section are examples of the current state of the art.

This Month's Technical Papers

Pseudodensity Log Generation by Use of Artificial Neural Networks

Cointerpretation of Distributed Acoustic and Temperature Sensing for Inflow Profiling

Efficient Optimization Strategies for Developing Intelligent-Well Business Cases

Recommended additional reading

OTC 26509 Limitations of Using Smart Wells To Achieve Waterflood Conformance in Stacked Heterogeneous Reservoirs: Case Study From Piltun Field by Harsimran Khural, Shell, et al.

SPE 180165 DAS/DTS/DSS/DPS/DxS—Do We Measure What Adds Value? by Kousha Gohari, Baker Hughes, et al.

SPE 181110 Optimal Field Development and Control Yield Accelerated, More-Reliable Production: A North Sea Case Study by M. Haghighat Sefat, Heriot-Watt University, et al.

SPE 181435 Machine-Learning Approach for Irregularity Detection in Dynamic Operating Conditions by Mohamed Sidahmed, BP, et al.

hudson-john.jpg
John Hudson, SPE, has more than 25 years of experience in flow assurance, production-system design, and technology development. He has held technical and managerial positions in Shell at locations in Europe and North America, providing consultancy to a diverse set of assets globally. His activities have included the development of a model-based, cloud-computing solution that was deployed to gas-production systems with combined capacity in excess of 10 Bcf/D. He is currently a principal production engineer at Shell and the product manager for Shell’s PetroSigns Flow simulator and integrated reservoir and asset simulation platform. Hudson holds a PhD in chemical engineering from the University of Illinois. He serves on the JPT Editorial Committee and can be reached at www.linkedin.com/in/hudsonjohnd.