Occidental CEO Rejects US Carbon Tax in Break With Big Oil
Occidental Petroleum has split from some of its larger rivals by rejecting a potential US carbon tax, saying that it prefers the existing system of tax credits.
Occidental Petroleum has split from some of its larger rivals by rejecting a potential US carbon tax, saying that it prefers the existing system of tax credits designed to encourage oil companies to store carbon dioxide and reduce emissions.
The position appears to stand in contrast with that of supermajors such as ExxonMobil and the American Petroleum Institute industry group, which voted last month to endorse putting a tax or other price on carbon dioxide emissions to replace other greenhouse gas regulations. Independent producers and refiners have long been opposed to such a levy.
“A carbon tax would be bad for a lot of the industry, a carbon tax would be bad for the consumers and especially for those consumers who are more disadvantaged from an economic standpoint,” Occidental Chief Executive Officer Vicki Hollub said at a conference hosted by the Texas Independent Producers and Royalty Owners Association on 6 April. “A carbon tax is not what we’re pushing at all.”
Occidental has attempted to position itself as one of America’s more climate-forward oil producers, making its opposition to a carbon tax more noteworthy. The Houston-based company was the first large US oil producer to announce a goal to reach net zero carbon emissions by mid-century and has ambitious plans to build in Texas the world’s biggest facility to store carbon captured directly from the atmosphere.
Last month, API said its support for a carbon tax hinges on replacing existing regulations on greenhouse gases—a trade-off seen as key to luring support from Republicans on Capitol Hill. But Occidental’s CEO sees such a measure as punitive for the industry.
Instead, Hollub prefers the 45Q tax structure that gives companies credit for capturing carbon and storing it underground. She also praised California for its low-carbon fuel standards, saying they functioned better than Europe’s policy of limiting emissions and trading allowances.
“We in Texas kind of criticize California a bit,” but the state is “addressing carbon the right way,” Hollub said. California’s fuel standards, along with the 45Q carbon storage tax credit, is “incentivizing the use of technology and rewarding the use of technology,” she said.