Reservoir simulation

Physics-Informed Deep-Learning Models Improve Forecast Scalability, Reliability

This paper presents a workflow that combines probabilistic modeling and deep-learning models trained on an ensemble of physics models to improve scalability and reliability for shale and tight-reservoir forecasting.

Generic simulation modeling framework. SRV = simulated reservoir volume.
Fig. 1—Generic simulation modeling framework. SRV = simulated reservoir volume.
Source: URTeC 4042557.

In the complete paper, the authors present a workflow that combines probabilistic modeling and deep-learning models trained on an ensemble of physics models to improve scalability and reliability for shale and tight reservoir forecasting. Their approach is applied to synthetic cases and many wells in the Permian Basin. Through hindsight studies, these models have been demonstrated to generate realistic and diverse production curves, capture the physics of unconventional flow, quantify well-production-outlook uncertainty, and help interpretation of subsurface uncertainty.

Introduction

In the realm of unconventional asset development, scalable forecasting is a key component in forecast reliability. In recent years, data-driven machine-learning models and workflows have emerged as potent tools for predicting well performance, particularly in scenarios where wells share similar reservoir properties, completion designs, and operational conditions.

A novel approach known as physics-informed machine learning (PIML) has gained prominence.

×
SPE_logo_CMYK_trans_sm.png
Continue Reading with SPE Membership
SPE Members: Please sign in at the top of the page for access to this member-exclusive content. If you are not a member and you find JPT content valuable, we encourage you to become a part of the SPE member community to gain full access.