Unconventional/complex reservoirs

Multiwell-Pressure History Matching in Delaware Play Helps Optimize Fracturing

The authors of this paper define a work flow that constrains solutions that match models and field observations and obtains a more-representative model for forecasting and optimizing fracture behavior.

Results of hydraulic fracture modeling using the field-pumping schedules, field sequencing, and field timing between fracturing. Hundreds of these simulations were conducted for PHM.
Fig. 1—Results of hydraulic fracture modeling using the field-pumping schedules, field sequencing, and field timing between fracturing. Hundreds of these simulations were conducted for PHM.

Because hydraulic fracture models include complex physics and uncertainties defined by many variables, the problem of calibrating modeling results with field responses is ill-posed. It is always possible to find a calibrated model that reproduces field data; however, such a model is not unique and multiple matching solutions exist. The objective and scope of the complete paper is to define a work flow for constraining these solutions and obtaining a more-representative model for forecasting and optimization.

Introduction

In this project, a work flow is presented that uses an ultrafast hydraulic fracturing model with well-known physics and high-confidence rock-property inputs to conduct sensitivity analysis for pad-scale field development. Based on a study of uncertainty on the model variables, the two most-uncertain variables (tectonic strain and leakoff multiplier) are selected for model calibrations.

×
SPE_logo_CMYK_trans_sm.png
Continue Reading with SPE Membership
SPE Members: Please sign in at the top of the page for access to this member-exclusive content. If you are not a member and you find JPT content valuable, we encourage you to become a part of the SPE member community to gain full access.