Unconventional/complex reservoirs

Crosswell Strain and Production-Interference Testing Integrated in the Permian Basin

The authors integrated azimuths and intensities recorded by fiber optics and compared them with post-flowback production-allocation and interference testing to identify areas of conductive fractures and offset-well communication.

Gunbarrel view of the pad. Zipper groups are annotated to the bottom right of each well.
Fig. 1—Gunbarrel view of the pad. Zipper groups are annotated to the bottom right of each well.
Source: SPE 212336.

In Permian Basin fracturing operations, azimuths and intensities recorded by single-use distributed fiber optics in two wells are integrated and compared with post-flowback production-allocation and interference testing acquired with intervention fiber optics to identify areas of hydraulically conductive fractures and communication between offset wells. The production-allocation/interference testing method appears to reveal hydraulically connected fractures even in the absence of strain data.

Introduction

Intervention-based fiber optics have proved a valuable and cost-effective tool in understanding during-fracturing and post-flowback well and section performance. During-fracturing diagnostics, such as crosswell strain measurements from an offset monitor well, describe where fractures intersect the monitor well and reveal details such as azimuth, fracture-propagation velocity, and activation and reactivation statistics. These critical data points help inform cluster, stage, and well-spacing decision-making.

×
SPE_logo_CMYK_trans_sm.png
Continue Reading with SPE Membership
SPE Members: Please sign in at the top of the page for access to this member-exclusive content. If you are not a member and you find JPT content valuable, we encourage you to become a part of the SPE member community to gain full access.