Flow assurance

Streamlined Multidisciplinary Work Flow Assesses Pipeline Slugging

An integrated multidisciplinary work flow can improve the assessment of pipeline slugging fatigue for offshore field developments.

Slug-flow interface data example showing mixture density over a 500-m length of pipeline.
Fig. 1—Slug-flow interface data example showing mixture density over a 500-m length of pipeline.

Free spans exist in subsea multiphase pipelines laid over undulating seabed profiles or across continental scarps for offshore field developments. Slug-flow-induced fatigue damage on the free spans can have a significant effect on project economics. Slug-flow assessments can prove time-consuming. The complete paper describes an integrated iterative approach between the flow-assurance and pipeline-engineering disciplines to streamline the work flow based on the value or cost associated with changes in input parameters that affect pipeline fatigue-assessment outcomes.

Slug-Flow Assessment Work Flow

The complete paper further details key goals for each step.

Step 1: Plan Project Slug-Flow Design Requirements. Key to this step is to create a close interface between flow-assurance and pipeline engineers to discuss and align overall timing, critical decisions, and hold points that are required as part of the slug-flow assessment and any specific project-design considerations.

Step 2: Execute Slug-Flow-Prediction Assessment.

Restricted Content
We're sorry, but this content is reserved for SPE Members. If you are a member, please sign in at the top of the page for access. If you are not a member and you find JPT content valuable, we encourage you to become a part of the SPE member community.